Orthopedic Treatment for Military

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) reports new research to benefit troops and the upcoming surge authorized by President Obama.

One of Newton's basic physical laws: For each action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. So after the surge in U.S. troops heading to Afghanistan, there will be an influx of injured veterans returning back home. But the U.S. Department of Defense has recruited its own "soldiers" in the battle against war casualties: a consortium of researchers who are improving care to wounded soldiers as well as the general public.

The fourth annual Extremity War Injuries Symposium was held in Washington, D.C., last January to bring together military and civilian orthopaedic surgeons, researchers, experts from governmental agencies, and others to discuss challenges faced by U.S. medical personnel working in Iraq and Afghanistan and to discuss ways to synergize resources and improve care for wounded warriors. A paper summarizing the findings from the symposium is published in the January 2010 issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (JAAOS).

Some of the orthopaedic researchers involved will lead a workshop about the program at the 56th annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS), March 6 - 9, 2010, in New Orleans. They will also present an overview of the program during Extremity War Injuries V, a symposium that takes place Jan. 27 - 29 in Washington, D.C.

While signature war injuries include traumatic brain injury from exposure to repeat blasts, the Orthopaedic community sees its share of obvious war related injuries.  The presentation of these symposiums and conferences is good thing for our veterans.  It also lets us all know that there is not the same level of "discarding" our vets when they return home as was in previous wars.  I suppose the best solution is to end the war and hopefully we are moving in that direction.

 

.

Hurt Locker and Blast Injuries

I just saw the Hurt Locker directed and produced by Kathryn Bigelow.  A movie about the solitude of explosive munitions neutralizer soldiers.  The entire movie portrays disarming Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) sometimes successfully and sometimes not.  The movie is nominated for an Oscar.

An IED is a device fabricated or placed in an improvised manner, incorporating lethal, noxious, pyrotechnic, or incendiary materials designed to destroy, incapacitate, harass, or distract. It may incorporate military parts, but is normally constructed from nonmilitary components.

What the movie does not provide is the reality these repeated trauma have on soldiers. 

To study such biomechanics and injury, the North American Brain Injury Society (NABIS) formed one of the first committees.   Blast Injury and TBI by Ronald C. Savage, EdD Executive Vice President, NABIS, states:

During the Vietnam War and the Persian Gulf War, 76 percent of American troops survived combat wounds. But in this century, the U.S. military's surgical teams "have saved the lives of an unprecedented 90 percent of the soldiers wounded in battle…" (New England Journal of Medicine, December, 2006). Furthermore, Walter Reed Army Medical Center reported that nearly 30% of all patients with combat-related injuries seen at Walter Reed from 2003 to 2005 sustained a TBI and that blast injuries are a significant cause of TBIs In addition, they reported that TBI is often associated with severe multiple trauma, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or undiagnosed concussions. Thus, screening soldiers who are at risk for a TBI is important in order to ensure that TBIs are identified and appropriately treated.

Diagnosis can be difficult even when TBI is apparent or the patient is able to describe a concussive head injury to their doctors. The more common mild brain injury often has more than mild consequences and can cause depression, reduced cognitive functioning, nausea,
sleep disturbance, erratic behavior, and mood swings. These impairments are exacerbated by misdiagnosis, lack of treatment and the public’s misperceptions about brain injury and mental illness. For veterans with brain injuries, the lack of physical signs and the diffuse nature of symptoms may be met with skepticism, considered to be psychological, or worse, malingering.

As professionals in the field know, the “walking wounded” do not disappear. And many more will be seen and heard in this decade. Thanks to improvements in protective gear and swift medical treatment, more of America's wounded are surviving - and returning home with serious, permanent injuries. How will these veterans fare in the routines of daily life? Will they be able to maintain employment? How will their injuries impact their families, friends, co-workers, and communities?

The North American Brain Injury Society has begun to address these important issues. We recently published a special edition of Brain Injury Professional that focused solely on blast injury and TBI. NABIS would like to extend our sincere appreciation and thanks to Representative Bill Pascrell, co-chair of the Congressional Brain Injury Task Force, who wrote a thoughtful introduction, and also to Dr. Tina Trudel who served as Guest Editor.

In addition, the Planning Committee of our 2007 conference has organized a number of sessions devoted to the topic of blast injury. NABIS will continue to explore additional ways that we can create positive change in this area and we look forward to sharing those ideas with our membership in the future. 
 

Susan Lance, a speech pathologist specializing in •developmental problems •strokes
•brain injuries and •other neurological disorders, states, 

 

PTSD and MTBI in Veterans Study

Pietrzak and colleagues published their study in the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Mediates the Relationship Between Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Health and Psychosocial Functioning in Veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2009;197(10):748-753).

The study, from Yale University, evaluated whether posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) mediated the relationship between mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) and general health ratings, psychosocial functioning, and perceived barriers to receiving mental healthcare 2 years following return from deployment in veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF).

"Compared with respondents who screened negative for MTBI, respondents who screened positive for MTBI were younger, more likely to have PTSD, more likely to report fair/poor overall health and unmet medical and psychological needs, and scored higher on measures of psychosocial difficulties and perceived barriers to mental healthcare. Injuries involving loss of consciousness were associated with greater work-related difficulties and unmet psychological needs. PTSD mediated the relationship between MTBI and all of these outcomes." 

The researchers concluded: "These results underscore the importance of assessing PTSD in OEF/OIF veterans who screen positive for MTBI."


For additional information, contact R.H. Pietrzak, Yale University, School Medical, National Center PTSD, VA Connecticut Healthcare Systems, 950 Campbell Avenue 151E, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
 

Back Injury Second Leading Military Disability

Interestingly, back injury is reported second to psychiatric injury as a leading cause of military personnel non-return to duty.

Military personnel evacuated out of Iraq and Afghanistan because of back pain are unlikely to return to the line of duty regardless of the treatment they receive, according to research led by a Johns Hopkins pain management specialist.

In a study published in the  Archives of Internal Medicine, researchers found that just 13 percent of service members who left their units with back pain as their primary diagnosis eventually returned to duty in the field. Women, officers, those deployed in Afghanistan and those with previous back pain had better outcomes, but only marginally. Aside from combat injuries sustained during battle, the return-to-duty rate for spinal pain and other musculoskeletal disorders is lower than for any other disease or non-combat injury category except for psychiatric illness, the researchers said.
 

Read more here.